"House Democrats' draconian gun control bills would deprive law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights and pave the way for a national gun registry, while doing nothing to prevent mass shootings or stop criminals from obtaining firearms," said Reschenthaler. Both bills passed the House by near party-line votes. 1446 would allow the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to indefinitely delay legal firearm purchases. 8 would criminalize common practices among gun owners while failing to prevent criminals from obtaining firearms, while H.R. – This week, Congressman Guy Reschenthaler (PA-14) defended law-abiding Americans' Second Amendment rights by opposing H.R. None of that is possible without reasonable dialogue.MaReschenthaler Votes to Defend Second Amendment Rights We also want gun owners’ rights protected. We want everyone to be able to come to the table and work to reduce crime and violence in this state. ![]() How do you ever get consensus when that’s the level of the discourse? Remember learning about the last civil war? Brother killing brother? That’s what we’re talking about. Things like trigger locks with fingerprint technology would likely be more effective in preventing deaths than banning AR-15s.Įither way, we can’t have a discussion around this important issue when the rhetoric includes threats of war. The focus on AR-15 style weapons is misguided, since those weapons are responsible for a tiny fraction of gun deaths. We also think the Democrats sometimes overreach in their push for gun control. Most Americans believe in the right to keep and bear arms, but there is also broad support for more gun control measures like comprehensive background checks. This is frustrating because if you look at polling, we’re not as far apart on this issue as people think. ![]() The ability to compromise and improve the situation, especially around gun violence, disappears. What happens when people get that heated is that the two sides start to talk past each other. Over-the-top hyperbolic rhetoric isn’t the type of passion we need though. We want our representatives to be passionate about the issues. I should have chosen a couple of different words that were included there.” “That doesn’t change my position, but I do want you to understand that firearms are something that are near and dear to folks on the Western Slope and throughout rural Colorado. “They were chosen carefully, but I do want to apologize for a couple of words that were in the tweet because I do think it’s important that we choose our words carefully,” he added. Normally I’m known as being rational and reasonable, and choosing my words very carefully. “I feel that it’s my duty to explain why. “Over this weekend some of you may have noticed I acted out of character on Twitter,” he said from the floor of the House. ![]() Soper, to his credit, acknowledged that he went too far. Posting online you may not be targeting someone specifically, but your colleagues and the people who support them can still see the words. We doubt Soper would yell “prepare for civil war!” at another lawmaker. It’s also easy to get carried away on Twitter in a way you never would in a face to face conversion. We understand how passionate people are about this issue. Soper apologized on Monday for some of the phrasing in the Tweet, which was the right thing to do.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |